Why is art an expression?

Art is the expression or application of human creativity and imagination. Whether it's a poem, a doodle or a musical, art, in all its forms, captures ideas, transmits emotions, reveals experiences and reveals perspectives that reflect individual and collective circumstances. Art allows students to release stress in a healthy way. It provides them with an alternative way to express themselves, whether through a shared experience or a more private one. However, the elimination of funding for the arts instead of STEM subjects continues to occur.

Romanticism, with its general emphasis on emotions and its departure from classicism, adopted and fostered the view that art is a form of expression in the sense of self-reflection or self-discovery. This theory, which Alan Tormey (197) called the theory of artistic expression, is a rival both to ostentatious idealism and to the theory of excitation. According to expression theory, works of art are expressions of the emotional states experienced by the artist during the creative process. In one variant or another, this view has been supported in the 19th and 20th centuries by thinkers such as Eugène Véron, Benedetto Croce, R.

If you are obsessed with staying “safe” with art or are worried about what others think your art should be, you will end up not revealing much about yourself. For Tolstoy, it is essential to the sincerity of art that the artist feels that emotion is communicating, and a condition for the success of art is that the public is infected with the same feeling. While some artists use their tools as a means to show their ancient roots, others use art as a response to political questions, what is known as art as activism or, simply, as artivism. Waters has continued to use art as an escape route into his adulthood and, although he doesn't stick to any specific rules, he always puts into art what he feels at the time.

During the period of German idealism, when art was seen as a manifestation of the spirit, the expressive power of art was much more vindicated. Perhaps, then, the theory of expression can be rescued from the common objection that it makes art and the expressive process too mentalistic, but it is not clear if it can be saved from another theory, which accuses it of committing the genetic fallacy of confusing judgments about the artist, the source of art, with judgments about art itself. Art is meant to be as the artist wants it to be, and art could be a reaction to outrage against established systems. Later, Nietzsche allied art more closely with the Dionysian solution to the problem of life, presenting the Dionysian in art as an expression of the basic human impulse called the will to power.

It is somewhat difficult to say with confidence if these fiction-based visions are types of incarnation theory, since, like theories of expression, they emphasize the processes underlying expression in the arts rather than on the logic and semantics involved in the attribution of expressive properties to works of art.