How can art be a form of expression?

Art is the expression or application of human creativity and imagination. Whether it's a poem, a doodle or a musical, art, in all its forms, captures ideas, transmits emotions, reveals experiences and reveals perspectives that reflect individual and collective circumstances. Art gives us the ability to express ourselves in a way that nothing else can. Art as a representation of external existence (it is true that “seen through a temperament”) has been replaced by art as an expression of the inner life of human beings.

Sufficiency for something to be art requires an importance for art lovers, which endures as long as the chips or types of the work of art persist. The stratification of art according to its value and the resulting tension also increases its meaning, and the meaning of art for society. Identifying instances of art is relatively simple, but it's difficult to find a definition of art that includes all possible cases. Despite opposing theories, works of art can be considered to have “family resemblances” or “traits of resemblance” that link instances very different artistic.

The fundamental difference between art and beauty is that art is about who produced it, while beauty depends on who looks at it. Art promotes the development of a civilization, since it supports the established system and also prevents subversive messages from being silenced: art promotes, reflects and reveals change in politics and morality. At this point, the obvious recognition of what art really is is implicit; in other words, the author doesn't have to tell you that it is art when, otherwise, you would have no idea. The answer to the question could, perhaps, be found in Berys Gaut's criteria for deciding if an artifact is, in fact, art, that is, if the pieces of art work only as pieces of art, as they intended its creators.

With boring predictability, almost everyone who discusses art today falls into a “relative gap”, in which they do their best to demonstrate how open they are and how unavoidably lax the concept of art is. These influences must contribute to the cultural understanding of what art is at any time, making ideas about art dependent on culture. Artistic periods, such as classical, Byzantine, neoclassical, romantic, modern and postmodern, reflect the changing nature of art in social and cultural contexts; and changing values are evident in the different contents, forms and styles. Art doesn't have to produce beautiful objects or events, since a great work of art can validly awaken emotions other than those awakened by beauty, such as terror, anxiety or laughter.

The government found that visual arts students reported significantly higher levels of school attendance than non-visual arts students. So where does that leave the subjective notion that beauty can still be found in art? If beauty is the result of a process by which art gives pleasure to our senses, then it must remain a matter of personal discernment, even if outside forces cry out to seize She.